Albrecht nails cancer chip makers

2008 June 3

Mainstream reporters helped spread VeriChip “lies,” Spychips author says

(Katherine Albrecht, the world’s most influential opponent to the use of RFID tags for tracking humans, is driving another nail into VeriChip, and its MSM dupes, for promoting subcutaneous chipping. Photo: Anne Hellmond)

from Mark:

I always tell my journalism students that objectivity should not come at the expense of the truth.

Still, many reporters appear to take the corporate suits at their word, despite compelling evidence from grassroots technology opponents (link, excerpt, below).

A simple denial from VeriChip, for example, seemed enough to balance the scales for reporters at Time Magazine, Business Week, and RFID Journal, after Albrecht told an AP reporter about animal studies strongly suggestive of a chip-cancer link.

Industry and government are fairly adept at damage control. After I wrote a Wired story about Homeland Security human tracking scheme in early 2005, the agency enlisted a computer rag hack in an attempt to discredit my original piece.

VeriChip similarly reached out to Time magazine to soften the blow of the surprising findings of cancer in animals bearing microchip implants, which Albrecht brought to light.

Albrecht believes the VeriChip might be a precursor to the Mark of the Beast described in the Book of Revelation.

Verichip Cancer Report
VeriChip’s media efforts have done little to salvage the company’s public image or its financial performance, both of which plummeted after research linking the implantable microchip to cancer was first widely revealed by the Associated Press in September 2007. The same company that once predicted revenues in the “billions” earned just $3,000 from its microchip implant operations in the first quarter of 2008, as patients shun the device that many are now calling the “cancer chip.”

Investors have also distanced themselves from the failing company, with VeriChip’s stock plummeting from a high of $10.62 last year to just over $2.00 today.

pixelstats trackingpixel

[Post to Twitter] Tweet This Post  [Post to Plurk] Plurk This Post  [Post to Yahoo Buzz] Buzz This Post  [Post to Delicious] Delicious This Post  [Post to Digg] Digg This Post  [Post to Reddit] Reddit This Post  [Post to StumbleUpon] Stumble This Post 

No Responses
  1. 2008 June 4
    James permalink

    This lady is a true nutjob! These chips have been SAFELY implanted and used by over 20 million cats and dogs for over 15 years WITHOUT INCIDENCE. I guess she would like for you to just ignore that FACT!! Just another fear mongerer of the like of idiot bush.

  2. 2008 June 5
    Chris Bieber permalink

    James
    the true messengerkiller and sycophant

    Your obliviousness to logic and reason is displayed in spades…

    You and YOUR idiot Presidente can have YOUR IMPLANTED!(you have no qualms about using that word to describe IMPLANTING into HUMAN BEINGS!(your wife/daughter/parent??) ..mere collateral damage)surveillance chips.

    YOUR hitech surveillance society will not be pleasant…for you and your servile ilk it might be as you have no desire for freedom(possibly a chance to watch AmerIdol or go to the Laker game is your room temperature IQ desire) so you will blithely wave at the CCTVs all around you. and watch the tube…..

    go ahead and laugh all the way to YOUR temporary detention facility when the State clamps down..

    take your grammatically illiterate sentences and cowardice with you……you proud patriotic American Quisling…

  3. 2008 June 5
    alex permalink

    good job Katherine Albrecht,!,
    go on , don’t stop.
    the truth will set up free.

  4. 2008 June 5

    THEY CAN GIVE ME AND MY FAIMLY THE CHIP AND VAC SHOTS AFTER WE ARE DEAD.
    F.T.G.

  5. 2008 July 28
    eric permalink

    James,
    You say “. I guess she would like for you to just ignore that FACT!! ”

    But you don’t back yourself ! Where is your proof of your ‘facts’ ‘
    are you making things up or don’t you have at least a site link to support yourself ? I beleve you stand on sinking sand James,
    without some references, who’s going to beleive you ?

    Katherine has many sources, including scientific journals and peer reveiws.

Comments are closed.

Tweet This Post links powered by Tweet This v1.3.9, a WordPress plugin for Twitter.